<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 992 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181553</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the disallowance under section 40A(2)(b) was deleted. The Tribunal considered factors such as the lack of security for the loans, flexibility in repayment, and difficulties in obtaining bank loans in reaching this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 992 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181553</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the disallowance under section 40A(2)(b) was deleted. The Tribunal considered factors such as the lack of security for the loans, flexibility in repayment, and difficulties in obtaining bank loans in reaching this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>