<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1446 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181537</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, directing the AO to disallow 25% of the alleged illegal expenses for the respective assessment years. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating expenses and client awareness to avoid disallowances under section 37(1) and the Explanation to section 37(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:59:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1446 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181537</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, directing the AO to disallow 25% of the alleged illegal expenses for the respective assessment years. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating expenses and client awareness to avoid disallowances under section 37(1) and the Explanation to section 37(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>