https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181533 Forfeiture proceedings under SAFEMA depend on a valid, subsisting detention order under COFEPOSA; where the detention order has been revoked, the statutory foundation for forfeiture disappears and the proceedings cannot stand. Preventive detention also requires grounds of detention to exist and be formulated contemporaneously with the order; draft or non-contemporaneous materials are insufficient. On the stated facts, the detention orders were held invalid for breach of Article 22(5), and the consequential forfeiture notices were set aside. en-us Fri, 08 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:27:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181533 Forfeiture proceedings under SAFEMA depend on a valid, subsisting detention order under COFEPOSA; where the detention order has been revoked, the statutory foundation for forfeiture disappears and the proceedings cannot stand. Preventive detention also requires grounds of detention to exist and be formulated contemporaneously with the order; draft or non-contemporaneous materials are insufficient. On the stated facts, the detention orders were held invalid for breach of Article 22(5), and the consequential forfeiture notices were set aside. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181533