<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 17 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3086</link>
    <description>Amounts received under interim court directions, subject to possible restitution, do not accrue as taxable income when the recipient has no vested or unconditional right to retain them. Because the receipt remained contingent on the outcome of the underlying dispute and could be refunded if the opposing party succeeded, the income test of accrual in praesenti was not satisfied. The operative principle is that compensation or similar receipts become taxable only when the right to receive them is final and unconditional; on that basis, the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 17 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3086</link>
      <description>Amounts received under interim court directions, subject to possible restitution, do not accrue as taxable income when the recipient has no vested or unconditional right to retain them. Because the receipt remained contingent on the outcome of the underlying dispute and could be refunded if the opposing party succeeded, the income test of accrual in praesenti was not satisfied. The operative principle is that compensation or similar receipts become taxable only when the right to receive them is final and unconditional; on that basis, the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>