<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1217 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181517</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on the factory building for the assessment year 2005-06, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Regarding the reduction of administrative expenses disallowance, the ITAT deleted the disallowance made by the AO, citing precedents from the Bombay High Court and the Kerala High Court. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the Cross-Objection by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:19:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1217 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181517</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on the factory building for the assessment year 2005-06, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Regarding the reduction of administrative expenses disallowance, the ITAT deleted the disallowance made by the AO, citing precedents from the Bombay High Court and the Kerala High Court. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the Cross-Objection by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>