<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1524 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181511</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was unsustainable due to the lack of proper satisfaction by the Assessing Officer and the defective show cause notice. The orders imposing penalty were canceled, and the appeal by the Assessee was allowed. The Tribunal did not address other arguments on the merits of the penalty order due to its conclusions on the primary issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:03:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1524 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181511</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was unsustainable due to the lack of proper satisfaction by the Assessing Officer and the defective show cause notice. The orders imposing penalty were canceled, and the appeal by the Assessee was allowed. The Tribunal did not address other arguments on the merits of the penalty order due to its conclusions on the primary issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>