<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 687 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326573</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders dismissing the appeal, the petition for installment payments, and the application for restoration of the appeal. The Court directed the Tribunal to hear the appeal afresh on merits, emphasizing that procedural requirements should not override substantive justice. The Tribunal was instructed to expedite the disposal of the appeal, ensuring both parties had a fair opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 687 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326573</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders dismissing the appeal, the petition for installment payments, and the application for restoration of the appeal. The Court directed the Tribunal to hear the appeal afresh on merits, emphasizing that procedural requirements should not override substantive justice. The Tribunal was instructed to expedite the disposal of the appeal, ensuring both parties had a fair opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>