<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 674 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326560</link>
    <description>An upfront payment fixed through competitive bidding for securing a 99-year lease and a joint venture was treated as consideration for the transaction structure and future lease benefit, not as rent under Section 194-I of the Income-tax Act. Because the amount was determined before the lease deed was crystallised and answered the nature of a premium or entry consideration, no tax deduction at source arose on that footing. The amount also was not payment to the lessor, as the governing orders required most of it to be passed to the Government, so the TDS mechanism was not attracted against the recipient described as lessor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 674 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326560</link>
      <description>An upfront payment fixed through competitive bidding for securing a 99-year lease and a joint venture was treated as consideration for the transaction structure and future lease benefit, not as rent under Section 194-I of the Income-tax Act. Because the amount was determined before the lease deed was crystallised and answered the nature of a premium or entry consideration, no tax deduction at source arose on that footing. The amount also was not payment to the lessor, as the governing orders required most of it to be passed to the Government, so the TDS mechanism was not attracted against the recipient described as lessor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>