<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 668 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326554</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed as the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. The additions made by the AO were deleted on various grounds including lack of evidence linking foreign account deposits to defense contracts, non-taxability of certain remittances, and non-resident status of the appellant. The ITAT found in favor of the assessee based on earlier judgments/orders, leading to the dismissal of Revenue&#039;s appeals and partial allowance of the assessee&#039;s Cross Objections. The appellant was not held liable to pay tax on amounts in the HSBC account, and additions on interest income were negated due to non-taxable status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:58:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 668 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326554</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed as the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. The additions made by the AO were deleted on various grounds including lack of evidence linking foreign account deposits to defense contracts, non-taxability of certain remittances, and non-resident status of the appellant. The ITAT found in favor of the assessee based on earlier judgments/orders, leading to the dismissal of Revenue&#039;s appeals and partial allowance of the assessee&#039;s Cross Objections. The appellant was not held liable to pay tax on amounts in the HSBC account, and additions on interest income were negated due to non-taxable status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>