<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 665 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326551</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee by deleting the addition of unexplained cash credit and the disallowance of TDS. The Tribunal found that the explanations provided for the cash credit from one source were satisfactory, leading to the deletion of that portion of the addition. Additionally, it was determined that the assessee was not liable to deduct TDS for the relevant year, resulting in the deletion of the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 665 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326551</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee by deleting the addition of unexplained cash credit and the disallowance of TDS. The Tribunal found that the explanations provided for the cash credit from one source were satisfactory, leading to the deletion of that portion of the addition. Additionally, it was determined that the assessee was not liable to deduct TDS for the relevant year, resulting in the deletion of the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>