<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 661 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326547</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, reducing the disallowance of labor expenses to Rs. 5.95 lakhs while upholding the addition of Rs. 15 lakhs towards sundry creditors. The enhancement of assessed income by the CIT (A) was deemed valid and justified based on the evidence and legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:58:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 661 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326547</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, reducing the disallowance of labor expenses to Rs. 5.95 lakhs while upholding the addition of Rs. 15 lakhs towards sundry creditors. The enhancement of assessed income by the CIT (A) was deemed valid and justified based on the evidence and legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>