<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 655 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326541</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the addition of deemed dividend for both assessment years, emphasizing the need for factual evidence to support claims and the strict interpretation of the provisions of section 2(22)(e) in determining taxability. The appeals were dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 655 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326541</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the addition of deemed dividend for both assessment years, emphasizing the need for factual evidence to support claims and the strict interpretation of the provisions of section 2(22)(e) in determining taxability. The appeals were dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>