<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 143 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3071</link>
    <description>The case involved the classification of imported goods as edible or non-edible grade under the customs tariff act. The dispute centered on whether palmolein should be classified as edible grade for duty exemption. The Commissioner (Appeals) initially classified the goods as edible grade, which was challenged by the Revenue. After considering factors like acid value and co-mingling of goods in tanks, the Appellate Commissioner reclassified the goods as palmolein of edible grade. Additionally, the timing of importation for classification purposes was discussed, with the Tribunal determining that entry into territorial waters marked the taxable event. The classification decision was upheld based on the bill of entry date and the goods meeting edible grade criteria.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 143 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3071</link>
      <description>The case involved the classification of imported goods as edible or non-edible grade under the customs tariff act. The dispute centered on whether palmolein should be classified as edible grade for duty exemption. The Commissioner (Appeals) initially classified the goods as edible grade, which was challenged by the Revenue. After considering factors like acid value and co-mingling of goods in tanks, the Appellate Commissioner reclassified the goods as palmolein of edible grade. Additionally, the timing of importation for classification purposes was discussed, with the Tribunal determining that entry into territorial waters marked the taxable event. The classification decision was upheld based on the bill of entry date and the goods meeting edible grade criteria.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>