https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181467 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court judgment and impugned orders, granting liberty to respondents to proceed anew. The petitioners argued that their cases were not decided by the High Court and should be adjudicated following the Supreme Court's judgment. The opposing side acknowledged this but stated that the High Court already applied the judgment universally, revoking the impugned orders. Despite being served notices in line with the Supreme Court judgment, the petitioners can pursue further legal recourse if dissatisfied, leading to the disposal of the Writ Petitions. en-us Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:17:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181467 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court judgment and impugned orders, granting liberty to respondents to proceed anew. The petitioners argued that their cases were not decided by the High Court and should be adjudicated following the Supreme Court's judgment. The opposing side acknowledged this but stated that the High Court already applied the judgment universally, revoking the impugned orders. Despite being served notices in line with the Supreme Court judgment, the petitioners can pursue further legal recourse if dissatisfied, leading to the disposal of the Writ Petitions. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181467