<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1101 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181441</link>
    <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to consider only the peak amount from the undisclosed bank account for addition as income. The issue of inflation in the opening stock figure was not pursued by the assessee and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1101 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181441</link>
      <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to consider only the peak amount from the undisclosed bank account for addition as income. The issue of inflation in the opening stock figure was not pursued by the assessee and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>