<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1094 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the quashing of reassessment proceedings due to a change of opinion, ruling in favor of the assessee. However, it reversed the decision on treating the non-compete fee as revenue expenditure, siding with the Revenue. The Tribunal allowed the claim for depreciation on the non-compete fee, treating it as an intangible asset. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the order pronounced on 14/01/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:16:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1094 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the quashing of reassessment proceedings due to a change of opinion, ruling in favor of the assessee. However, it reversed the decision on treating the non-compete fee as revenue expenditure, siding with the Revenue. The Tribunal allowed the claim for depreciation on the non-compete fee, treating it as an intangible asset. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the order pronounced on 14/01/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>