<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1071 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181448</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case appeal, emphasizing adherence to legal precedents and tax authority circulars. The decision upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to deduction under Section 80IA without setting off losses/unabsorbed depreciation, based on established jurisprudence and a clarifying circular. It clarified that the &quot;initial assessment year&quot; in Section 80IA(5) is the year chosen by the assessee for deduction, aligning with the option provided in Section 80IA(2) to select the initial assessment year. The judgment stressed the importance of consistent interpretation of tax laws to ensure proper application of deductions and minimize disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:16:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1071 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181448</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case appeal, emphasizing adherence to legal precedents and tax authority circulars. The decision upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to deduction under Section 80IA without setting off losses/unabsorbed depreciation, based on established jurisprudence and a clarifying circular. It clarified that the &quot;initial assessment year&quot; in Section 80IA(5) is the year chosen by the assessee for deduction, aligning with the option provided in Section 80IA(2) to select the initial assessment year. The judgment stressed the importance of consistent interpretation of tax laws to ensure proper application of deductions and minimize disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>