<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 653 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326539</link>
    <description>The appeal by the revenue challenging the deletion of a penalty for breach of contract by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was dismissed. The Tribunal held that the penalty was compensatory, not penal, and therefore deductible under section 37 of the Income Tax Act. Citing the Supreme Court decision in Prakash Cotton Mills P. Ltd. v. CIT, the Tribunal found no legal infirmity in its decision. As a result, the penalty amount of Rs. 65,52,000 added by the Assessing Officer was deleted from the assessee&#039;s total income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:15:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 653 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326539</link>
      <description>The appeal by the revenue challenging the deletion of a penalty for breach of contract by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was dismissed. The Tribunal held that the penalty was compensatory, not penal, and therefore deductible under section 37 of the Income Tax Act. Citing the Supreme Court decision in Prakash Cotton Mills P. Ltd. v. CIT, the Tribunal found no legal infirmity in its decision. As a result, the penalty amount of Rs. 65,52,000 added by the Assessing Officer was deleted from the assessee&#039;s total income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>