<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 641 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326527</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving the Income Tax Act. It held that the primary object of the assessee was the advancement of education, and incidental commercial activities did not affect its charitable nature. The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s order without any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 641 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326527</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving the Income Tax Act. It held that the primary object of the assessee was the advancement of education, and incidental commercial activities did not affect its charitable nature. The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s order without any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>