<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 637 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326523</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna was dismissed. The Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of expenditures for the assessment year 2007-08 was overturned by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The main issue revolved around the applicability of Section 40 A (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning aggregate payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 to a person in a day. The Court found that for the relevant assessment year, the provision did not consider aggregating payments, and as no single payment exceeded Rs. 20,000, the Assessing Officer&#039;s action was unjustified. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial legal question arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:14:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 637 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326523</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna was dismissed. The Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of expenditures for the assessment year 2007-08 was overturned by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The main issue revolved around the applicability of Section 40 A (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning aggregate payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 to a person in a day. The Court found that for the relevant assessment year, the provision did not consider aggregating payments, and as no single payment exceeded Rs. 20,000, the Assessing Officer&#039;s action was unjustified. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial legal question arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>