<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 633 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance of entertainment and travelling expenses to 20% of the expenses incurred, resulting in a sustained disallowance of Rs. 1,60,378 for entertainment expenses and Rs. 8,44,432 for travelling expenses. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s consideration of commercial expediency and proportionality reasonable, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:14:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 633 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance of entertainment and travelling expenses to 20% of the expenses incurred, resulting in a sustained disallowance of Rs. 1,60,378 for entertainment expenses and Rs. 8,44,432 for travelling expenses. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s consideration of commercial expediency and proportionality reasonable, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>