<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 627 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326513</link>
    <description>Pasteurising milk, converting part of it into curd and butter milk, and packing the products were treated as prima facie manufacturing activities under Chapter Note 6 to Chapter 4 of the Central Excise Tariff and Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, because a process deemed to be manufacture by a Chapter Note is manufacture for excise purposes. The quantity-based packing structure also did not, on a prima facie view, separate out any taxable service element so as to negate the manufacturing character of the activity. On that basis, a complete waiver of pre-deposit was considered justified and recovery of the demanded liability was stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:12:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 627 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326513</link>
      <description>Pasteurising milk, converting part of it into curd and butter milk, and packing the products were treated as prima facie manufacturing activities under Chapter Note 6 to Chapter 4 of the Central Excise Tariff and Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, because a process deemed to be manufacture by a Chapter Note is manufacture for excise purposes. The quantity-based packing structure also did not, on a prima facie view, separate out any taxable service element so as to negate the manufacturing character of the activity. On that basis, a complete waiver of pre-deposit was considered justified and recovery of the demanded liability was stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>