<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 624 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326510</link>
    <description>Mineral oil sludge settling in storage tanks was treated as residue or waste, not a manufactured product, so it fell outside the Central Excise Tariff and was not excisable. On the CENVAT issue, Rule 3(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 was held inapplicable because the material cleared was sludge at the bottom of the tank, not an input removed as such; accordingly, no proportionate reversal of credit was required. The demand, penalty, and interest were therefore unsustainable, and the assessee obtained consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 624 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326510</link>
      <description>Mineral oil sludge settling in storage tanks was treated as residue or waste, not a manufactured product, so it fell outside the Central Excise Tariff and was not excisable. On the CENVAT issue, Rule 3(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 was held inapplicable because the material cleared was sludge at the bottom of the tank, not an input removed as such; accordingly, no proportionate reversal of credit was required. The demand, penalty, and interest were therefore unsustainable, and the assessee obtained consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>