https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326503 The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned Order that rejected the sales returns claim under the CST Act and KVAT Act. The Court emphasized the need for reconsideration as crucial evidence, including a letter confirming goods rejection and transport receipts, was overlooked by the Commissioner. The matter was remanded for a fresh consideration with directions to pass an appropriate order after hearing both parties. The impugned Order was set aside, and the suo motu revision was restored to the Commissioner for further review within six months. en-us Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326503 The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned Order that rejected the sales returns claim under the CST Act and KVAT Act. The Court emphasized the need for reconsideration as crucial evidence, including a letter confirming goods rejection and transport receipts, was overlooked by the Commissioner. The matter was remanded for a fresh consideration with directions to pass an appropriate order after hearing both parties. The impugned Order was set aside, and the suo motu revision was restored to the Commissioner for further review within six months. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326503