<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 984 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181436</link>
    <description>The Cross Objection (CO) filed by the assessee was dismissed as it was deemed infructuous. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the eligibility for deduction u/s 80IB(10) for the Krishna Park and Prasiddhi projects was upheld. The Tribunal ruled that the projects did not meet the requirements of clause (d) applicable from 01-04-2005, as clarified in a prior judgment. Consequently, the assessee was denied the deduction u/s 80IB(10) for both projects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 17:54:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 984 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181436</link>
      <description>The Cross Objection (CO) filed by the assessee was dismissed as it was deemed infructuous. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the eligibility for deduction u/s 80IB(10) for the Krishna Park and Prasiddhi projects was upheld. The Tribunal ruled that the projects did not meet the requirements of clause (d) applicable from 01-04-2005, as clarified in a prior judgment. Consequently, the assessee was denied the deduction u/s 80IB(10) for both projects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>