<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1945 (3) TMI 18 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181425</link>
    <description>A trust whose dominant object was to award scholarships to descendants of a named family, with only limited discretion to assist others from a specified community and to make advances to start a scholar in life, was not wholly for charitable purposes because the Act required a public element. The provision for advances was also non-charitable, so the income did not qualify for exemption. As the deed gave trustees discretion over recipients, numbers, amounts, and application of income, the beneficiaries were not fixed in definite shares and the income fell within the trustee charging provision, making it assessable at the maximum rate in the hands of the trustees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 1945 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:55:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1945 (3) TMI 18 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181425</link>
      <description>A trust whose dominant object was to award scholarships to descendants of a named family, with only limited discretion to assist others from a specified community and to make advances to start a scholar in life, was not wholly for charitable purposes because the Act required a public element. The provision for advances was also non-charitable, so the income did not qualify for exemption. As the deed gave trustees discretion over recipients, numbers, amounts, and application of income, the beneficiaries were not fixed in definite shares and the income fell within the trustee charging provision, making it assessable at the maximum rate in the hands of the trustees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 1945 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>