<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1189 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal ITA No. 1008/Pn/2009 due to the penalty effect being below Rs. 2 lakhs. However, the remaining appeals were allowed, restoring the penalties imposed by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of applying Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) correctly and maintaining consistency in legal principles across different assessment years within the same group.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1189 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal ITA No. 1008/Pn/2009 due to the penalty effect being below Rs. 2 lakhs. However, the remaining appeals were allowed, restoring the penalties imposed by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of applying Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) correctly and maintaining consistency in legal principles across different assessment years within the same group.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>