<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Excise Cenvat credit availing rule against Pota cabin purchase for office use</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110196</link>
    <description>Whether Cenvat/Modvat credit is admissible on a porta cabin used as office furniture depends on its classification as a capital good and on whether the office is within factory premises. A tribunal ruling recognised credit on chairs and tables in a service-tax context, but Chapter 94 (furniture) is excluded from the definition of Capital Goods under Rule 2 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, affecting eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:00:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Excise Cenvat credit availing rule against Pota cabin purchase for office use</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110196</link>
      <description>Whether Cenvat/Modvat credit is admissible on a porta cabin used as office furniture depends on its classification as a capital good and on whether the office is within factory premises. A tribunal ruling recognised credit on chairs and tables in a service-tax context, but Chapter 94 (furniture) is excluded from the definition of Capital Goods under Rule 2 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, affecting eligibility.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:00:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>