<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 137 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3056</link>
    <description>Negative net worth, supported by a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and a BIFR declaration of sickness, established that the company qualified as a sick industrial company under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. On that basis, the company was treated as entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery, and the appeal was restored for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 137 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3056</link>
      <description>Negative net worth, supported by a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and a BIFR declaration of sickness, established that the company qualified as a sick industrial company under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. On that basis, the company was treated as entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery, and the appeal was restored for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>