<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 136 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3054</link>
    <description>Excess stock of sponge iron found in silo, bags and loose form was quantified through dip reading, average bag weight and estimation of loose stock. On that basis, confiscation was not sustained merely because the alleged excess was computed by estimation, and the confiscation was set aside. The note states that where excess stock is determined on an estimated basis, that computation alone is insufficient to justify confiscation, and the assessee&#039;s relief was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 136 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3054</link>
      <description>Excess stock of sponge iron found in silo, bags and loose form was quantified through dip reading, average bag weight and estimation of loose stock. On that basis, confiscation was not sustained merely because the alleged excess was computed by estimation, and the confiscation was set aside. The note states that where excess stock is determined on an estimated basis, that computation alone is insufficient to justify confiscation, and the assessee&#039;s relief was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>