<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 852 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181412</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether interest on borrowed funds used to acquire shares was deductible under s.57(iii) of the Income-tax Act. The tribunal held that the borrowing was for making an investment intended to earn dividend income, and the fact that share acquisition could also incidentally confer controlling interest was a commercial consequence that did not alter the income-earning purpose. Since dividend income was taxable in the relevant year, the interest expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for earning such income and was allowable under s.57(iii). The disallowance was set aside and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 852 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181412</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether interest on borrowed funds used to acquire shares was deductible under s.57(iii) of the Income-tax Act. The tribunal held that the borrowing was for making an investment intended to earn dividend income, and the fact that share acquisition could also incidentally confer controlling interest was a commercial consequence that did not alter the income-earning purpose. Since dividend income was taxable in the relevant year, the interest expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for earning such income and was allowable under s.57(iii). The disallowance was set aside and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>