https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181397 In writ jurisdiction, the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or substitute its own factual view for an administrative inference on the voluntariness of a resignation; certiorari is confined to jurisdictional error, error apparent on the face of the record, or comparable legal infirmity. The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded those limits by treating the matter as a factual appeal and quashing the Government's conclusion. The reinstatement of the teacher was therefore restored, while the question of arrears of pay and allowances was remitted to the Government for fresh decision after hearing both sides. en-us Thu, 08 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:55:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181397 In writ jurisdiction, the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or substitute its own factual view for an administrative inference on the voluntariness of a resignation; certiorari is confined to jurisdictional error, error apparent on the face of the record, or comparable legal infirmity. The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded those limits by treating the matter as a factual appeal and quashing the Government's conclusion. The reinstatement of the teacher was therefore restored, while the question of arrears of pay and allowances was remitted to the Government for fresh decision after hearing both sides. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181397