<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 607 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326493</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962, against the appellant for involvement in the attempted export of prohibited red sanders. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s complicity established through credible evidence, including consistent statements of a co-accused, corroborated by the seizure of red sanders and other circumstantial evidence. Emphasizing the importance of enforcing customs laws, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, highlighting that leniency in such cases would undermine justice and deterrence against fraud.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 607 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326493</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962, against the appellant for involvement in the attempted export of prohibited red sanders. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s complicity established through credible evidence, including consistent statements of a co-accused, corroborated by the seizure of red sanders and other circumstantial evidence. Emphasizing the importance of enforcing customs laws, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, highlighting that leniency in such cases would undermine justice and deterrence against fraud.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>