<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 605 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326491</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, set aside the impugned order, and held that the investigation failed to establish the case of clandestine removal against the appellants. Penalties imposed on the main appellant and other appellants were deemed unjustified due to insufficient evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence and proper investigative procedures in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 605 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326491</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, set aside the impugned order, and held that the investigation failed to establish the case of clandestine removal against the appellants. Penalties imposed on the main appellant and other appellants were deemed unjustified due to insufficient evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence and proper investigative procedures in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>