https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326490 The Tribunal upheld the penalty on Appellant No.1 under Section 11AC but reduced it to 25% of the duty confirmed. The appeal by Appellant No.2 succeeded, with the Tribunal ruling that a separate penalty on the partner was not sustainable. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals by Appellant No.1 and Revenue, finding violations of declaration terms and imposition of penalties justified under Section 11A and Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules. en-us Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:42:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326490 The Tribunal upheld the penalty on Appellant No.1 under Section 11AC but reduced it to 25% of the duty confirmed. The appeal by Appellant No.2 succeeded, with the Tribunal ruling that a separate penalty on the partner was not sustainable. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals by Appellant No.1 and Revenue, finding violations of declaration terms and imposition of penalties justified under Section 11A and Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326490