<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 598 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the tax liability for &#039;business auxiliary service&#039; but ruled out the tax demand for &#039;scientific or technical consultancy service&#039; based on statutory provisions and prior tribunal decisions. Penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside due to the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 598 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the tax liability for &#039;business auxiliary service&#039; but ruled out the tax demand for &#039;scientific or technical consultancy service&#039; based on statutory provisions and prior tribunal decisions. Penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside due to the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>