<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 574 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326460</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) in dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal against the additions to income and unexplained purchases. The ITAT emphasized the importance of disclosing all relevant facts and reiterated the separate assessment nature of each tax year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:39:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 574 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326460</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) in dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal against the additions to income and unexplained purchases. The ITAT emphasized the importance of disclosing all relevant facts and reiterated the separate assessment nature of each tax year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>