<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 885 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181389</link>
    <description>Delay of more than seven years in filing the appeals was condoned because the ex parte adjudication orders were not shown to have been duly served on the appellants. Service of the show cause notices was said to have been effected by affixation, but there was no reliable proof of proper service of either the notices or the adjudication orders. The appellants stated that they obtained copies only later and filed the appeals promptly thereafter, and their delay applications were supported by uncontroverted affidavits. The explanation was accepted as sufficient and convincing, so the appeals were entertained despite the long delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 885 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181389</link>
      <description>Delay of more than seven years in filing the appeals was condoned because the ex parte adjudication orders were not shown to have been duly served on the appellants. Service of the show cause notices was said to have been effected by affixation, but there was no reliable proof of proper service of either the notices or the adjudication orders. The appellants stated that they obtained copies only later and filed the appeals promptly thereafter, and their delay applications were supported by uncontroverted affidavits. The explanation was accepted as sufficient and convincing, so the appeals were entertained despite the long delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>