<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1215 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s consolidated order resulted in various appeals being dismissed, partly allowed for statistical purposes, or remanded back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication. The decisions were based on precedents and jurisdictional High Court rulings, with specific instances of disallowances, additions, and deductions being upheld or overturned based on the evidence and legal arguments presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:56:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1215 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s consolidated order resulted in various appeals being dismissed, partly allowed for statistical purposes, or remanded back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication. The decisions were based on precedents and jurisdictional High Court rulings, with specific instances of disallowances, additions, and deductions being upheld or overturned based on the evidence and legal arguments presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>