<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 559 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326445</link>
    <description>The court held that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening the assessment was illegal as it was based on a mere change of opinion. The court found that the Assessing Officer had accepted the valuation report and exemption claim during the original assessment, making the reopening unjustified. Consequently, the court quashed the notice and allowed the petition with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 559 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326445</link>
      <description>The court held that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening the assessment was illegal as it was based on a mere change of opinion. The court found that the Assessing Officer had accepted the valuation report and exemption claim during the original assessment, making the reopening unjustified. Consequently, the court quashed the notice and allowed the petition with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>