<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 558 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326444</link>
    <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed in the case. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to rework the addition concerning excavation charges and verify the confirmation for sundry creditors. The decisions of the CIT(A) regarding the unexplained cash credit and TDS disallowance were upheld. The order was pronounced on April 12, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 558 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326444</link>
      <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed in the case. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to rework the addition concerning excavation charges and verify the confirmation for sundry creditors. The decisions of the CIT(A) regarding the unexplained cash credit and TDS disallowance were upheld. The order was pronounced on April 12, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>