<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 548 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326434</link>
    <description>The court quashed the show cause notice dated 21st April 2006 and the hearing notice dated 13th August 2013, deeming them invalid due to being barred by limitation, influenced by external authorities, and pre-determined. The court emphasized the necessity for specific allegations of suppression and the prohibition of double assessment for the same period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 548 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326434</link>
      <description>The court quashed the show cause notice dated 21st April 2006 and the hearing notice dated 13th August 2013, deeming them invalid due to being barred by limitation, influenced by external authorities, and pre-determined. The court emphasized the necessity for specific allegations of suppression and the prohibition of double assessment for the same period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>