https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326431 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the disallowance of cenvat credit for service tax paid on various taxable services before 01.04.2011. The Member determined that the appellant was entitled to the credit based on the definition of "Input Service" under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 prior to the rule amendment. The matter was remanded to the original authority to ascertain the accurate amount eligible for cenvat credit, emphasizing the appellant's entitlement to the benefit on the disputed services. en-us Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326431 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the disallowance of cenvat credit for service tax paid on various taxable services before 01.04.2011. The Member determined that the appellant was entitled to the credit based on the definition of "Input Service" under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 prior to the rule amendment. The matter was remanded to the original authority to ascertain the accurate amount eligible for cenvat credit, emphasizing the appellant's entitlement to the benefit on the disputed services. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326431