https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326430 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision in a case involving duty evasion allegations. The Tribunal found the Revenue's evidence insufficient to prove clandestine removal, emphasizing the lack of tangible evidence and inculpatory statements. Additionally, discrepancies in goods cleared were noted, with the appellant failing to provide evidence to rebut findings. The Court agreed with the Tribunal's assessment, emphasizing the need for evidence inspiring confidence in the Revenue's case. As no substantial legal questions were raised, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the appeal. en-us Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:15:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326430 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision in a case involving duty evasion allegations. The Tribunal found the Revenue's evidence insufficient to prove clandestine removal, emphasizing the lack of tangible evidence and inculpatory statements. Additionally, discrepancies in goods cleared were noted, with the appellant failing to provide evidence to rebut findings. The Court agreed with the Tribunal's assessment, emphasizing the need for evidence inspiring confidence in the Revenue's case. As no substantial legal questions were raised, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326430