<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 534 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326420</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision that the transactions were exempt from Delhi Value Added Tax under the Central Sales Tax Act. The Court held that the movement of goods was in line with the contract with Delhi Metro Railway Corporation Ltd. and fell within the exemptions provided by the CST Act. The Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the parties to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 534 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326420</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision that the transactions were exempt from Delhi Value Added Tax under the Central Sales Tax Act. The Court held that the movement of goods was in line with the contract with Delhi Metro Railway Corporation Ltd. and fell within the exemptions provided by the CST Act. The Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the parties to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>