https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3033 The High Court dismissed appeals challenging orders by CESTAT in favor of the respondent for refund of Central Excise Duty. The Court held that the duty was paid based on provisional prices, refunds were claimed within the prescribed period, and subsequent price agreements were transparent. Finding no unjust enrichment, the Court upheld the correctness of the impugned orders, concluding that no substantial legal question was involved. The appeals were dismissed based on the analysis of relevant legal precedents. en-us Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3033 The High Court dismissed appeals challenging orders by CESTAT in favor of the respondent for refund of Central Excise Duty. The Court held that the duty was paid based on provisional prices, refunds were claimed within the prescribed period, and subsequent price agreements were transparent. Finding no unjust enrichment, the Court upheld the correctness of the impugned orders, concluding that no substantial legal question was involved. The appeals were dismissed based on the analysis of relevant legal precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3033