<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 946 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181358</link>
    <description>Districtwise recruitment may validly limit each candidate to one district where the restriction promotes administratively workable selection, prevents duplicate testing and ranking, and does not create hostile discrimination under Articles 14 and 16. Candidates who submit applications for multiple districts contrary to notified conditions, or falsely deny doing so in the application form, are subject to valid rejection and acquire no enforceable claim to selection. Reading down is unavailable where the condition is facially valid and consistent with the recruitment scheme. Equitable relief, including consideration based on age-related hardship, is unavailable to candidates who breached the condition or made false declarations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:05:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 946 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181358</link>
      <description>Districtwise recruitment may validly limit each candidate to one district where the restriction promotes administratively workable selection, prevents duplicate testing and ranking, and does not create hostile discrimination under Articles 14 and 16. Candidates who submit applications for multiple districts contrary to notified conditions, or falsely deny doing so in the application form, are subject to valid rejection and acquire no enforceable claim to selection. Reading down is unavailable where the condition is facially valid and consistent with the recruitment scheme. Equitable relief, including consideration based on age-related hardship, is unavailable to candidates who breached the condition or made false declarations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>