https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181358 A districtwise recruitment condition limiting candidates to one district was treated as valid because it served administrative feasibility, avoided duplicated testing and ranking, and did not, on the stated facts, create hostile discrimination under Articles 14 and 16. Rejection of candidature was also upheld where applicants applied in more than one district or made false declarations in the application form, since the notification and rules expressly made such conduct liable to summary rejection. The article further notes that reading down was unnecessary and equitable relief was unavailable because the candidates had breached the notified conditions, so no interference was called for. en-us Thu, 03 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:05:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181358 A districtwise recruitment condition limiting candidates to one district was treated as valid because it served administrative feasibility, avoided duplicated testing and ranking, and did not, on the stated facts, create hostile discrimination under Articles 14 and 16. Rejection of candidature was also upheld where applicants applied in more than one district or made false declarations in the application form, since the notification and rules expressly made such conduct liable to summary rejection. The article further notes that reading down was unnecessary and equitable relief was unavailable because the candidates had breached the notified conditions, so no interference was called for. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181358