https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181356 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete additions/disallowances made by the Assessing Officer, emphasizing the lack of incriminating evidence from the search and the unreliability of Mr. Mukesh Choksi's statements. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals and the assessee's cross objections, confirming the deletion of additions and disallowances. The jurisdictional issue under section 153A was contested by the assessee but ultimately not pursued during arguments, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn. en-us Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:02:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181356 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete additions/disallowances made by the Assessing Officer, emphasizing the lack of incriminating evidence from the search and the unreliability of Mr. Mukesh Choksi's statements. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals and the assessee's cross objections, confirming the deletion of additions and disallowances. The jurisdictional issue under section 153A was contested by the assessee but ultimately not pursued during arguments, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181356