<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Removal of goods i.e. Input, Capital Goods as such </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110190</link>
    <description>Rule 3(5) directs payment equal to credit availed for inputs or capital goods removed as such, and its language and tribunal practice treat the reversal obligation as applying to goods rather than to input services, so CENVAT on input services used in the factory need not be reversed when goods are removed as such.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:58:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=423837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Removal of goods i.e. Input, Capital Goods as such </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110190</link>
      <description>Rule 3(5) directs payment equal to credit availed for inputs or capital goods removed as such, and its language and tribunal practice treat the reversal obligation as applying to goods rather than to input services, so CENVAT on input services used in the factory need not be reversed when goods are removed as such.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:58:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>