https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3028 In judicial review of anti-dumping proceedings, the Court will not interfere where the Designated Authority applies the statutory thresholds, assesses dumping, injury and causation on relevant material, and records reasons. The termination was upheld because the Authority found certain imports de minimis, no sufficient evidence of injury or price undercutting, and landed values above the non-injurious price. The procedural challenge also failed because notice, access to the public file, opportunities to file data and oral hearing were given, confidential material could be withheld under the Rules, and no prejudice from non-disclosure or lack of reasons was shown. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3028 In judicial review of anti-dumping proceedings, the Court will not interfere where the Designated Authority applies the statutory thresholds, assesses dumping, injury and causation on relevant material, and records reasons. The termination was upheld because the Authority found certain imports de minimis, no sufficient evidence of injury or price undercutting, and landed values above the non-injurious price. The procedural challenge also failed because notice, access to the public file, opportunities to file data and oral hearing were given, confidential material could be withheld under the Rules, and no prejudice from non-disclosure or lack of reasons was shown. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3028